Skip to content

Conversation

@sca075
Copy link
Owner

@sca075 sca075 commented Dec 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Applied minor code formatting adjustments to improve consistency.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Signed-off-by: Sandro Cantarella <sandro@Sandros-Mac-mini.fritz.box>
Signed-off-by: Sandro Cantarella <sandro@79f3d049-9006-400d-9954-2e5dcd250fa9.fritz.box>
Signed-off-by: Sandro Cantarella <sandro@Sandros-Mac-mini.fritz.box>
Signed-off-by: SCA075 <82227818+sca075@users.noreply.github.com>
@sca075 sca075 self-assigned this Dec 20, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Walkthrough

A trailing newline is added to rand256_handler.py. No functional changes, logic modifications, or control flow alterations are present in this commit.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Whitespace/Formatting
SCR/valetudo_map_parser/rand256_handler.py
Add trailing newline at end-of-file

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

A newline so small, yet perfectly placed,
The rabbit hops forth with elegant grace,
No logic to change, just whitespace to mend,
A cosmetic touch—a neat little end. 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title contains a typo ('syinc' instead of 'sync') and is vague about what changes are being synced between branches. Consider revising the title to 'Sync dev_main with base dev' or provide a more specific description of the actual changes being merged.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev_main

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd6a4c1 and a5ca571.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • SCR/valetudo_map_parser/rand256_handler.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-19T06:48:40.379Z
Learnt from: sca075
Repo: sca075/Python-package-valetudo-map-parser PR: 29
File: SCR/valetudo_map_parser/rand256_handler.py:445-461
Timestamp: 2025-12-19T06:48:40.379Z
Learning: In SCR/valetudo_map_parser/rand256_handler.py, the bounding box comparison `self.robot_in_room["right"] <= int(robot_x) <= self.robot_in_room["left"]` is correct for the Rand256 coordinate system, which uses inverted or special axis conventions compared to standard Cartesian coordinates. The "left" value can be larger than "right" in this coordinate system.

Applied to files:

  • SCR/valetudo_map_parser/rand256_handler.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
SCR/valetudo_map_parser/rand256_handler.py (1)

546-546: Trailing newline addition — approved.

This formatting change aligns with common code style conventions. No functional changes detected.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sca075 sca075 merged commit da8b4d4 into main Dec 20, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@sca075 sca075 deleted the dev_main branch December 20, 2025 13:06
This was referenced Dec 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants